
A capstone project unit focused on building a public data product through interdisciplinary collaboration, computational analysis, and clear communication.
The capstone flipped the usual unit structure: instead of learning a method and then applying it to a toy dataset, we started with a real public-interest problem and had to figure out which methods were actually appropriate. That reverse pressure — from question to tool, not tool to question — is how real data science work actually operates, and it is a harder skill to develop. Working in an interdisciplinary team across majors meant we constantly had to translate between technical and non-technical language. I learned that the gap isn't about intelligence; it's about shared vocabulary. Building that shared vocabulary early in a project saves enormous amounts of rework later. Communicating uncertainty honestly to a non-specialist audience was the hardest single skill. Stakeholders want a confident answer, but good data science often produces a range of plausible answers with caveats. Learning to present that honestly without losing the audience's trust was something I worked on throughout the entire semester. The biggest carry-forward is probably process discipline: scoping, versioning, documentation, and reproducibility matter just as much as the analysis itself when the output needs to be a product that others can use, audit, or build on.